While the PC version is having its share of launch day woes, the community can sit tight knowing they at least have the more gorgeous of the two options by a long shot. (Note: These were taken at different in-game times, hence the brighter lighting in the maximum settings image.) Minimum settings (night time) Click these babies to see them at full-size to get a good look at the differences: Difference between minimum and maximum overall settingsĪnd for our last comparison, let's take a look at what the game looks like at minimum settings and what it looks like at maximum. The field of view option is the most game-changing of them and 100 FOV feels like the way No Man's Sky was meant to be experienced. For even more comparison purposes, here's what the PS4 field of view looks like (albeit on a different planet and smaller image dimensions). To compare, here are some shots of the on-foot field of view option at its minimum (60) and maximum (100). With your field of view cranked up you can see much more at a time than console players can, easily. The ability to play the game with better visuals than the PlayStation 4 version is exciting, but the field of view options are the most welcome of all. You can adjust not only the typical texture, shadow, and filtering options in No Man's Sky - but also the field of view (FOV) for both flight and when walking on foot. No Man's Sky cannot be played in any capacity on a PC that does not support OpenGL 4.5.
If you're not sure if your video card supports OpenGL 4.5, you can download the third-party tool GLView to check. This means those with integrated video cards may be out of luck. To add to this, the game requires a GPU compatible with OpenGL 4.5, something the minimum requirements on Steam do not mention outright. No Man's Sky requires a PC with at least: Let's take a quick look at the minimum requirements on Steam, with an addendum.
0 kommentar(er)
